Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 07:20

Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Alex Cora reacts to Boston Red Sox trading Rafael Devers, what went wrong - MassLive
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Scientists Identify Hidden Rule That Shapes All Life on Earth - SciTechDaily
Let’s just make it real clear:
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
71-year-old man makes history with world record for bench pressing - 11Alive.com
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
What’s next?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Apple Unveils AI-Powered 'Workout Buddy' for Apple Watch at WWDC - MacRumors
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
What are tips for weight loss?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.